Archive for

Starting a Profession As A Lawyer

Many people dream of becoming a lawyer in their lives but for different reasons could not make it. They might be unaware of the facts that becoming lawyer requires several difficult and challenging steps. If you are serious about practicing law, following are given few guidelines for becoming a lawyer.

If you really want to become a lawyer, start doing this from your high school. Taking part in mock trail teams and debates can help you learn few things.

Another important which you need to do is develop exemplary study habits such as reading, communication and comprehension skills.

You need to have great LSAT and GPA scores if you want to take admission in any reputable law school. The high scores can only be achieved through hard work.

You need to enroll yourself in an undergraduate college for 4 years degree program.

After completion of the degree, register yourself for Law Admission Test commonly known as LSAT. This test mainly focuses on to assess the applicant’s verbal reasoning and reading skills often used by schools.

LSAT is held three times a year, i.e. in the month of June, October and December. It is mandatory to pass the LSAT for a number of law schools.

Once you have cleared your LSAT, you are now ready to apply in a number of schools. Make one thing certain here that the law schools where you are applying should be accredited by American Bar Association (ABA). Application fees are usually high for law schools, so a careful and wise selection of the schools is required where they have an application waiver.

If you are one of those who meet their expenses on their own then it is the time to save some extra bucks for you for your school will not allow you to work for the first year.

Studying law involves a lot of hard work. You will not get enough time to waste. To complete your law successfully, you need to spend a lot of time in researching case laws, reading cases, writing briefs and preparing answers for class questions.

After the completion of first year, you should try to get a place in a law firm as an assistant, file clerk or messenger.

After graduating from law school one has to pass the Professional Responsibility Exam and later has to register him/her for state Bar Exam. This exam you can take in summer after completing your school.

This is the last step where you have to find a position as a lawyer. It is not easy as a lot of intense competition. Having any prior internship experience at a law will firm will definitely help.

Those who are good students and attend best law schools have got more job opportunities than others. Obviously, the competition is usually intense for best jobs and high grades.

Is a Lawyer Required for Every Workers Comp Claim?

The overall purpose of the workers compensation laws in Pennsylvania is to provide a means to ensure workers are fairly compensated for the expenses associated with workplace injury, without identifying blame for an accident. As such, many workers can obtain immediate medical attention after an injury at work as soon as the employer is notified of the accident. It is common for a worker who requires basic medical attention for relatively minor injuries to receive full care without ever completing a claim form or paying a bill.

Unfortunately, not all workplace injuries are straightforward. Many involve serious injuries that require extensive time away from work. When injuries are significant to severe-or in cases where claims are not considered valid-injury victims need the help of a Pennsylvania workers comp lawyer.

When a lawyer may be needed

The following are just a few examples of cases when an injured worker may need experienced legal assistance to help with a claim:

Denied claims. Your employer or the insurance company may deny your claim if they believe it to be invalid. In fact, state law does define claims to be invalid under certain situations-such as if they believe your injury was intentionally self-inflicted, or you were engaged in illegal activities (use of illegal drugs is a common allegation). Although the burden of proof is on the parties making these allegations, you need an experienced workers comp attorney to ensure your rights are protected.

Reduced claims. While the fact of your accident may not be denied, your employer or the insurance company may only approve a portion of the expenses cited in your claim. Skilled workers comp lawyers can help you collect the evidence required to prove the full value of your claim and either negotiate a fair settlement or appeal the decision.

Occupational injuries and illnesses. Not all workplace injuries are the result of a specific accident. Many employees-from office workers with repetitive stress injuries to laboratory workers exposed to toxic chemicals-develop their conditions over time. State workers comp law provides a complex set of schedules that identify covered conditions. You typically need a skilled attorney to navigate the rules and develop a case that proves your claims to be valid under the law.

The bottom line is that anyone experiencing problems with a claim or uncertain of how to proceed should seek advice from an attorney specifically experienced in Pennsylvania state law. In many cases, an initial consultation is free, after which many attorneys operate on a contingency fee basis. You pay no legal fees unless you receive compensation for your case.

Persuasive Techniques That Smart Lawyers Use in Court

Being a good lawyer requires a wide range of skills from having a comprehensive knowledge of the law, to being able to speak and perform well in front of an audience. They need to come up with a great strategy that weaves together the most useful facts and relevant laws and they need to be great at working with people and easing the concerns of a range of different clients.

Ultimately though, the main goal of any criminal lawyer is to persuade – to persuade the judge as well as the jury that their client is innocent. This means using the facts well, but it also means using subtle psychological techniques that can help to win over their audience – much the same as marketers and pickup artists might. Here are a few of the most powerful persuasive tools that lawyers can use.

Repetition

The human brain responds well to repetition as it sounds confident and confirms something we’ve already heard as true. In one study it was found that waiters who repeated the orders they took to their customers would on average receive a 10% better tip. Lawyers can use this effect by repeating key points in their case, or by repeating what their witnesses and clients say in order to give it more authority.

Bodylanguage

When we communicate, the vocabulary we use is really on part of the story and unconsciously we will be paying a huge amount of attention to more subtle body language cues. This includes a range of little signs that can make someone seem more truthful – for instance when someone nods their head as they talk. If a lawyer wants to make their case more convincing then, simply using a subtle nod of the head as they emphasise could help to do just that.

Asking Questions

Aristotle was a great philosopher and the mentor of Plato. He had several ideas that helped him to achieve his historical status, but one of the most popular is the ‘Aristotle technique’ which basically means using questions to avoid directly answering awkward questions. For instance then, if someone says ‘where were you at 3pm?’, answering using the Aristotle technique could mean saying ‘why does it matter?’ or ‘what are you implying?’. Of course when used in defence this needs to be done subtly as it can otherwise be spotted by astute lawyers and prosecutors.

Leading Questions and Assumptions

Likewise savvy lawyers can also use leading questions and assumptions to stack the decks in their favour. A classic study in psychology involves showing participants a video of a car crash and then asking them to estimate how fast the other car was going in two conditions. In the first condition the experimenter will ask ‘how fast was the red car going when it bumped into the blue car?’ while in the second they ask ‘how fast was the red car going when it smashed into the blue car?’. Surprise, surprise the participants in the second group would estimate the speed as being significantly higher than those in the first group.